max.patch wrote:
I hope you get it...I can make the case that sense 100% is "perfect" a number should never round up to 100%. That's just my opinion, not based on whatever mathematical rules apply.Astro wrote:
So if I can reel off another 133 in a row I can see 100% again. Should just be 114 more, but I can vent about that then if I actually get there.
The rounding detail goes back to my computer science background. But I also can see the philosophical perspective about 100% meaning perfect. Six Sigma is often called six nines for 99.9999% of 3.34 defects per million.
The road to glory cannot be followed with much baggage.
Richard Ewell, CSA General
Richard Ewell, CSA General